User:JC7V7DC5768/HelpMark

advice


 * Why i mistakenly did what I did

COi ANI advice fiasco
got 3 different advices about COI editors from 3 different admins, so i was confused at time (and still less than a month in)

talk of SJ
I was offended by her remarks until I realized why she said them, so i kind of cancelled out my views on that TP

talk page of edit warriors

 * Hoped to get their minds off their edit warring by suggesting (clearly via suggestbot or unclearly via Staten Island talk) they edit other articles instead of their POV pushing articles

EW of IP

 * First revert came with me telling IP in edit summary to discuss on talk page, after second revert I dropped stick and the IP not only reverted me but hounded me on my talk page from which I hounded back ,I eventually edited article again but not taking anything out but slightly expanding it

Rv on Windmill

 * Didn't realize that things in lead had to be cited if they were obvious, I was wrong. After my self rev of another editor's revert of me, I went to talk page to get consensus and when there was none I continued to not edit the windmill article

TP of ZPhl

 * I was drunk and upset over the articles content at the same time, I did self rv and it was just an article talk page, not a user talk, project space or article space

Android article as PROD instead of CSD

 * Because Android article was more organized the second time around than it was when I CSD'd it, so I used PROD instead (I didn't CSD it the second time around in compliance of the criteria 1 of the declined CSD criteria ie What Wikipedia is Not' guidelines)

Christopher Scott as customized tagging

 * Because I saw that Christopher Scott currently existed as a draft so I tagged the Christopher Scott article for deletion since it existed at the time in draft form. Didn't realize that the article was previously AFD'd or deleted (but even if I did know that, there was no way to know if the article was different enough now to not CSD it under that criteria under 'recreated article from a previous deletion discussion' criteria

My edit summary on AFD
When i typed 'AFC in October hopefully' i mistyped. I meant to type 'AFD in October hopefully' (AFD as in Articles for Deletion) meaning that I saw enough in the article to hope that it returns in the near future with better referencing and sources so at the very least it is good enough to withstand CSD and PROD (which means at the very worst it would be at Articles for Deletion). Hence why i used 'WP:too soon' when I nominated it for deletion (becuase it wasn't ready to be an article at this time). This article's subject may be notable in the future. I am a ATD so I always hope articles which are deleted come back better to at least withstand CSD and PRODDING.

future and since

No removing CSD tags on my articles
Don't remove a CSD tag from my article, instead protest the CSD tagging on the article's talk page.

COI advice I gave to new editor on AN/I
If i see COI editing, warn the COI account AND report them to UAA. As a LAST RESORT take them to COI. Use policies for COI reporting as my guidelines for advice to others who don't know how to report COI violators.

Edit warring over AZC
leave clear edit summaries, master WP:overcite, don't be so bitey to newcomers since I don't want to be bit (and even if i think I am right, keep it to myself and try to work within said policies), self imposed 0RR.

Talk page of Sarah Jeong article RW Warriors
Let edit warriors get WP:ROPED, don't try to take their minds off their edit wars via 'SuggestBot's or weird talk pages messages (hence I be dragged down with them).

Protest of AFD closing
To protest an AFD closing go to Wikipedia:Deletion Review to do so properly instead of doing so on the page of the closed AFD.

Windmill
Don't leave condensing edit summaries, and be sure to source edits (even ones which I think are obvious to others).

Cp

 * https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Dr.+Mary+Ellen+Glasgow%2C+Ph.D.%2C+R.N.%2C+ANEF%2C+FAAN%2C+ACNS-BC&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0

Sourcing
Don't use IMDB for sourcing (even if it is for award shows) EVER. Don't use Wikias as sources ever, under ANY circumstance. No blogs for sourcing.
 * Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources_that_are_usually_not_reliable


 * General


 * sourcing help
 * Reliable Source Search Engine (Google)
 * ONWB
 * User:TonyBallioni/UsefulMessages


 * fighting vandalism


 * Special:Log/newusers
 * WP:Not Vandalism
 * 
 * v not gf edit
 * v not gf edit
 * WPs
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ritchie333/Plain_and_simple_guide_to_vandalism

AIV diff reporting

1


 * Username violations


 * Don't report UAA names without edits unless...


 * Deletion

Wikipedia:Notability#Notability_is_based_on_the_existence_of_suitable_sources.2C_not_on_the_state_of_sourcing_in_an_article
 * CSD criteria
 * watch and wait on CSDs
 * (A7 does not apply to television series or churches)
 * Get a strong understanding of A7, G11, and G3 as they are the biggest contenders for deletion on wiki that you will see in NPR.
 * Candidates_for_speedy_deletion
 * Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes

more

Mz7 more anti vandalism patrol help GNG help GNG help
 * Legacypac/Cleanup_Guide


 * Writing /GNG


 * Improve my writing
 * WP:GNG