User:JCLuthier1993/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Sulfur assimilation)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Sulfur emissions in polluting processes is an important concern for the field of environmental public health. My preliminary impression of this article is that it concerns a complex set of chemical processes, but this article offers poor citation work to backup any of the claims made.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section: The lead section is adequate and does not have any red flags. However, I intend to review other highly rated scientific articles to get a sense of good introductions and suggest further edits based on this, as articles such as this one tend to follow a familiar format.

Content: The article seems to be well written, but the attention to detail seems to be unbalanced, being more developed in some areas more than others.

Structure: This article includes major headings, but could use more subheadings to guide readers through the complex material.

Tone: The tone of this article is neutral. Given that this article is not subject to a high degree of controversy, this seems appropriate.

Basic Grammar: This article contains numerous basic grammar issues for english readers. The scientific community is international and diverse. However, the level of grammar evident in this article is inadequate for english readers.

Sourcing: Sourcing is wholly inadequate given the norms for citing scientific work across most fields. This article utilizes many links to other articles, but this is not sourcing. The first of any improvements made should focus on improving citations.

Overall Impression: This article offers a mix of basic scientific terminology and advanced concepts. Because it is broad topic, it could be more fleshed out. However, it suffers from sourcing issues more than other issues, which should be given immediate attention.