User:JCo0197/Exposure Therapy/Maryannelindemann Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

JCo0197


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User JCo0197/Exposure_Therapy?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Exposure therapy

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead section of the original article is already strong, so I see why they did not change anything about that section. It is concise, to the point, and easy to follow.

The content that was added to the article is neutral and factual, as well as accurate to the topic of the article. I can see that they specifically made contributions to parts of the original article that needed changes, such as when something was labeled "dubious". This is important and helpful to the article since changes like that help make the article stronger. The content added didn't seem to try to represent one opinion more than another, but was just factual and to the point instead, which is good too.

There are no images yet, but being that we just went over that this week, I don't think it is important at the moment.

There aren't any grammatical errors in the added content. While the content that was added is strong, there is not too much. I think that instead of just focusing on the parts of the article that Wikipedia has said need to be corrected or changed. Overall, this is a really good start!

~