User:JEby1/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title False pleasure
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article is rated as a start-class with mid-importance.
 * I believe the article is written neutrally, it just explains what different philosophers believed about the topic.
 * The sources seem to all be from written works. There is only one external link that you need to enter your libraries information in to view.
 * This would be a good page to work on because there is such a lack of content. I would use outside sources to add on more information like how plato and other philosophers view false pleasures and its relation to different ethical theories.
 * This would be a good page to work on because there is such a lack of content. I would use outside sources to add on more information like how plato and other philosophers view false pleasures and its relation to different ethical theories.


 * Sources
 * Sommerville, Brooks A. "Attitudinal Pleasure in Plato’s Philebus". Phronesis 64.3: 247-276. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-12341922 Web.

Option 2

 * Article title Paradox of nihilism
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article is a work in progress, it's rated as start-class with low-importance.
 * The article is written neutrally.
 * The sources presented in the article are relevant but not very current.
 * This would be a good page to work on because I could better define nihilism and add more content in regards to the Nihilist's response to the paradox. I would do this to try and make this page more neutral. The paradox itself is also ill defined by the current page.
 * Sources
 * Kahane, Guy. “If Nothing Matters.” Nous, vol. 51, no. 2, June 2017, pp. 327-353. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1111/nous.12146.
 * Sources
 * Kahane, Guy. “If Nothing Matters.” Nous, vol. 51, no. 2, June 2017, pp. 327-353. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1111/nous.12146.

Option 3

 * Article title Legal positivism
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article is rated as start-class with high-importance.
 * This article is neutral in showing what positivism is but the topic it self is debatable.
 * I believe that this article has really good sources.
 * This would be a good project to work on because I can better define positivism adding more info to the first couple of sections. There is a abundance of information on this topic that is not shared in the page. To better explain positivism I can show how it differs from its counter theory.
 * This would be a good project to work on because I can better define positivism adding more info to the first couple of sections. There is a abundance of information on this topic that is not shared in the page. To better explain positivism I can show how it differs from its counter theory.


 * Sources
 * Plunkett, David. “Negotiating the Meaning of ‘Law’: The Metalinguistic Dimension of the Dispute over Legal Positivism.” Legal Theory, vol.22,no. ¾, Dec. 2016, pp. 205-275. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1017/S1352325216000070.