User:JHaupt46/Paleopathology/Gopp22 Peer Review

General info
Jhaupt46
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * N/A
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Paleopathology

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think that the article reference in French is a good one to follow in terms of structure; however, the English article that you cite has far extensive references. So perhaps combining the outline and structure with related content to the references of the article you've chosen will be a good combination.

Your bibliography looks like you have a lot of interesting references; I also think that the goal of your edits to this page are an interesting and relevant choice.

3/12 - I see that you have an outline and sections with applicable references listed. This looks really good! It's very clear, and looks consistent with the Wikipedia model / mode. Really nicely done from what I see here. It also looks like when you published these as live edits, you used the automatic referencing that Wikipedia has as a tool. Looks really well done!