User:JJ,1of1, AUS/User:Abd.2348/Margalla Hills/JJ,1of1, AUS Peer Review

General info
Abd.2348
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Abd.2348/Margalla Hills
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Margalla Hills - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Content:

1) The content added is related to the topic

2) The content added is up to date

3) There is no missing content or content that does not belong

4) The topic addressed is underrepresented

Tone and Balance:

1)The content added is neutral

2) The content added is not heavily biased towards a particular side

3) There are no points which are underrepresented or overrepresented

4) The content only aims to inform and not persuade

Sources and References:

1)The information added is backed up by reliable sources

2) The sources are current and thorough

3) A large chunk of information is only backed up by one source taking away from the aspect of diverse sources

4) Reliable sources in the form of peer reviewed articles could have been used

5) The links do work

Organisation:

1) The content added is clear, concise and easy to read

2) There are no grammatical errors or spelling mistakes

3) The content added is well organised

Overall Impression:

The overall content added is informative and improves the quality of the article with the organisation being the strong point, however more diverse set of sources should be picked, and the topic sentences should be kept in mind.