User:JJ1023/Blood-borne disease/Nby2216 Peer Review

General info
JJ1023
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:JJ1023/Blood-borne disease - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Blood-borne disease - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The lead paragraphs are very well written and the first one does a good job of explaining the topic of the article. You mention HIV, hepatitis B and hepatitis c in the intro (also later in the body paragraph) and maybe you can go into detail about each one in the body paragraphs, maybe under a section titled Types of Pathogens. Also, the mini paragraph about vector-borne disease may work better later on in the body as it does not seem relevant in the Lead where you are explaining diseases that are spread through blood.

Body: The body paragraphs are well organized and accurately labeled. I liked how you put sentences in bold to draw attention to the importance of the statement. I think a section discussing symptoms and the history to present of the disease would provide an even clearer understanding of the topic.

References: You may see if you can find 1-2 more sources just so you have an exhaustive list.

Images: The images you chose seem relevant to the topic and appear to have the proper captioning.