User:JJAlex22/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title: Life Writing ( Life writing)
 * Article Evaluation: The article’s content is relevant to the topic. Just from reading the first two paragraphs, you can tell that the writer is pro life-writing. So, it isn't completely neutral. The writer’s claims all have citations and they work properly. Their citations come in range and they appear to be reliable.
 * Sources: https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199799558/obo-9780199799558-0151.xml, https://www.wlupress.wlu.ca/Series/L/Life-Writing,
 * Sources: https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199799558/obo-9780199799558-0151.xml, https://www.wlupress.wlu.ca/Series/L/Life-Writing,
 * Sources: https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199799558/obo-9780199799558-0151.xml, https://www.wlupress.wlu.ca/Series/L/Life-Writing,

Option 2

 * Article title: Basic Writing ( Basic writing)
 * Article Evaluation: The article’s content is relevant to the topic. Within the first paragraph, the writer makes comments that can be interpreted as them having negative views towards basic writing. I don’t believe the writer has taken into consideration Wikipedia’s equity gaps.
 * Sources: https://www.readingrockets.org/reading-101-guide-parents/writing-basics, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365-life-hacks/writing/writing-for-beginners
 * Sources: https://www.readingrockets.org/reading-101-guide-parents/writing-basics, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365-life-hacks/writing/writing-for-beginners
 * Sources: https://www.readingrockets.org/reading-101-guide-parents/writing-basics, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365-life-hacks/writing/writing-for-beginners

Option 3

 * Article title: Collaborative Writing ( Collaborative writing)
 * Article Evaluation: The article’s content is relevant to the topic. I would say that this article is written neutrally. The citations also seem to be reliable and work efficiently.
 * Sources: https://writing.wisc.edu/handbook/process/collaborative-and-group-writing/,
 * Sources: https://writing.wisc.edu/handbook/process/collaborative-and-group-writing/,

Option 4

 * Article title: Peer review ( Peer review)
 * Article Evaluation: The article’s content is relevant to the topic. The article is neutrally written for the most part. The writer briefly mentions their opinion on the narrow view of peer review.
 * Sources: https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/publishing-your-research/peer-review/
 * Sources: https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/publishing-your-research/peer-review/
 * Sources: https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/publishing-your-research/peer-review/

Option 5

 * Article title: Editing ( Editing)
 * Article Evaluation: This article’s content is relevant to the topic. It is written neutrally. However, the piece itself is very brief and could expand on the topic of editing (great for me). The citations seem to be reliable.
 * Sources: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/07/smarter-living/how-to-edit-your-own-writing.html
 * Sources: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/07/smarter-living/how-to-edit-your-own-writing.html
 * Sources: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/07/smarter-living/how-to-edit-your-own-writing.html