User:JJlemus/Neurodiversity/Rslindse Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

JJlemus


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JJlemus/Neurodiversity?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Neurodiversity

Evaluate the drafted changes
Adding a lead section to the article would be very good and can help its direction and flow. A lead section may only require a brief description of what the article entails, findings (secondary sources), and examples. It looks like the author did a good job of adding new information to the article that also happens to be relevant.

The reference section seems to be empty. Adding two or three references can be helpful to the author and reader. References should be secondary sources. The added content appears to be new, but references are needed. Draft is well-written and readable. There are no spelling errors. To improve article, including references is suggested. Links in article are up to date.