User:JKBrenner/Rationing in the United States/Epear Peer Review

General info
JKBrenner
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:JKBrenner/Rationing in the United States
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Rationing in the United States

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?'''

Everything in the article is relevant to the topic, there was only one sentence that distracted me. It starts with "Wisconsin for example the council of defense". Maybe just adding "In Wisconsin" or something along those lines. Super easy fix.

'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?'''

I believe that the article is neutral. There weren't any claims or frames that appeared bias, just statements of facts/summaries.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

Yes there are viewpoints from women which often go underrepresented in the historical field.

'''Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''

Citations look great. They all work and seem to support the claims in the article. Links all work and the ones that don't have links are accesible.

'''Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''

Every source is reliable. The LA Times article could maybe be considered bias by people who are little more picky than I am, but I think that the information you pulled from it was reliable and unbiased in the way that you presented it. So I say you're good.

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?'''

Nothing appears to be out of date, it might be fun to add a blurb about the short film we watched that was produced by the government encouraging people to be citizen consumers and not be selfish when shopping.

Other Questions:

Does your peer have 5-7 reliable sources?

Yes my peer has 5-7 reliable sources.

Is at least one of them a source from class reading or the "suggested sources" list?

No, there are no sources from the class reading or suggested sources list.

Does the topic link in some way to our course material?

Yes it is very relevant.

Does your peer add historical context to their article?

Yes they added some good stuff that I didn't know about from our in-class content, so I would say they did.

'''Based on what you know from course content, what do you think Wikipedia users should know about this topic? In other words, what would you recommend adding and/or considering further?'''

Like I said above, a little bit more about some of the propaganda that was used to promote rationing could be cool, but overall great job and I'm not sure you need to add it or not.