User:JLW546/Hestia/Annika.Nicholas Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

JLW546


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JLW546/Hestia?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Hestia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The Lead Section – will state the most important information, give good overview of the rest of the article. It will be concise but avoid repeating the article content.


 * The lead section holds a lot of the topic sentences from all the sections. It does a good job summarizing the rest of the article but it seems briefly repetitive. Maybe try rewording the sentences so that they are not the same as the topic sentences for each section?

Clarity of Article Structure – each important aspect of the article should have its own clear and distinct section


 * The article is broken up into sections that are all relevant to Hestia, such as Worship and Equivalency to Roman gods.
 * The Pop culture information is also beneficial.
 * The worship section seems a bit long, is there any way you could possibly break it up into subcategories?

Coverage Balance – the article should be a balanced summary of existing resources without a dominant viewpoint


 * The article is well balanced and touches on several aspects of Hestia. It tends to drift towards worship and Hestia's role in the community rather than her role with the gods.
 * Could you address more of some of the myths that included Hestia?

Content Neutrality – the article should not try to persuade the reader of a specific idea or view


 * There are a few sentences here and there that somewhat provide specific persuasion. Be sure to change that sentence for the opening of that section.
 * The rest of the article provides basic facts and interpretable information.
 * Be careful with the status section. I like how you use different opinions and sources but be sure that your writing is summarizing and not persuading?

Sources – article content should be supported by good and reliable sources


 * Missing sources and citations so be sure to add those!

Images


 * Could you add more images such as statues, depictions in art and the roman figure?