User:JLeo500/Dalila Paola Mendez/Uclastudent2021 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing JLeo500's article on Dalila Paola Méndez.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JLeo500/Dalila_Paola_Mendez?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Does not exist.

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

The lead sentence does a great job at introducing the topic of the article. It summarizes the work of the artists and her inspiration. The information is concise and it seems to appear in the rest of the article.

Content:

All the content in the article is relevant to the article. The content appears to be up to date, especially the examples of artwork included. I believe more detail to the artist may be missing. I think finding more sources could help with this. The article deals with Wikipedia’s equity gaps because it is on a Chicana artist.

Tone and Balance:

The content added is neutral. There is no bias in the content and I did not feel persuaded by the article.

Sources and References:

All the statements and information have a source cited. I believe that the sources are thorough and current. The sources are diverse and seem reliable. I believe at least 2 of the sources are peer reviewed. All the source links worked fine!

Organization:

The content of the article is well-written. It is easy to read and follow. I did not notice any major grammatical errors besides a random “(“ in a sentence.  The content is divided in a good way with good subsections.

Images and Media:

No images or media were included.

For New Articles Only:

I believe that the author uses at least 2 reliable sources, but I’m not 100% sure. The list of sources is not exhaustive, so I would recommend to try to find other sources. The article follows the template we were given appropriately.

Overall Impressions:

I believe that this article is a good start. The author should try to find more information on their artist because there is potential to go more in detail. However, the current sources seem to be reliable so that is a good start. Overall great information.