User:JPD IRL0915/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Second pagan uprising in Hungary

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this as the first article I want to edit because it only needs copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. I figured this would be a good starting point and the subject matter is something I haven't learn anything about and have a slight interest in.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section


 * The lead section is only a single sentence and doesn't highlight any of the main topics of the article.
 * It clearly indicates what the topic is about, but could use more content and information about the main points.
 * Lead section only covers the topic.
 * Lead is too concise. No main points touched on at all.

Content


 * Content is relevant to the subject.
 * Content seems to be up to date.
 * Content seems to be complete, but could use a bit more detail or background information pertaining to the topic.
 * Content does not deal with marginalized groups, unless Pagans would be included.

Tone and Balance


 * Article presents information from a neutral standpoint.
 * No particularly biased claims present.
 * No over or underrepresented viewpoints present.
 * There are no instances of minority viewpoints needing to be addresses for this topic.
 * Article does not attempt to persuade one way or the other.

Sources and References


 * Facts in the article are minimally supported by citation. Three in total.
 * Sources are mostly in Hungarian. One out of the three sources is available in English and accessible through the link. One is accessible through a link, but is in Hungarian. The third is a book, also in Hungarian. There could be more sources in English offered to support current sources.