User:JShannon. 19/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Digital media use and mental health - Wikipedia)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)


 * 1) Lead Section -History and Terminology
 * 2) No citations in lead section
 * 3) Generic references to a “significant body of research” or “some experts” without naming or citing the source.
 * 4) Content
 * 5) The article is having many different sections on how its effecting mental health.
 * 6) Tone and Balance
 * 7) Formal tone
 * 8) Sources and References
 * 9) 194 different sources
 * 10) Certain claims are heavily sourced, with single sentences having upwards of 3 sources attached
 * 11) Many subsections are tied to the main article of their respective topic
 * 12) Organization and Writing Quality
 * 13) Long article, sections containing several paragraphs each
 * 14) Few charts or lists
 * 15) Appears thoroughly written
 * 16) Written in New Zealand English
 * 17) Images and Media
 * 18) 3 pictures
 * 19) One picture shows a reference to a study by displaying the results of it
 * 20) Talk page and discussion
 * 21) Article was once featured article of the day
 * 22) Article is level 5 importance to society, which is the lowest level
 * 23) One user felt the lead was not related to the content enough
 * 24) Overall Impression: I think that the article was written well. It was filled with tons of informative information. You can see that some of the information did not have citations.