User:JTCabrera/Turnip crinkle virus/Violettemoonlight Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

JTCabrera and Gandalf House


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JTCabrera/Turnip_crinkle_virus?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Turnip crinkle virus

Evaluate the drafted changes
The content added seemed very relevant and helpful in expanding the information about Turnip Crinkle Virus. I thought it was very useful that the the article talking about Arabidopsis thaliana was linked so that it could easily be accessed. The information seemed pretty up to date, with one of the articles even being published this year. Also, all the citations were from reliable scientific sources that weren't biased and all new information had a citation linked to it. The information seemed to be paraphrased pretty well so that it wasn't just copied straight from the sources. I think more information could be added to the replication section if the full article used as the source was accessible. I also think more information could be added about recombination based on what I read from the research article that was used as a source. This would make the available information more thorough. However, the information that was added from that source seemed to be accurate. The content seemed easy to understand, but there were a few minor grammar/spelling/punctuation errors that I noticed. Only one was found in the information that I believe is the new information added, but it would be helpful to correct previous authors' mistakes too. The section on Arabidopsis thaliana resistance to TCV was well written and contained information from multiple different sources, which made it more reliable and informative. The main thing, which I think could be improved, would be to simply add more information. There is a lot from the sources used that wasn't added to the article and by adding it, the article would be even more informative and useful for the general public. Violettemoonlight (talk) 22:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)