User:JTR124/sandbox

 Article Evaluation 


 * There are some things that don't relate to the topic directly which is something that kind of distracted me
 * There is a little information that is out of date
 * It could be improved with a little more information
 * The article seems to be neutral
 * The "Bibliometric studies of disciplines" section is underrepresented
 * The links of the articles seem to work and agree with the claims on the other article
 * The fact referenced is supported by a credible source. The sources come from medical facilities and other credible sources. They are not biased
 * There is little to no activity on the talk page
 * It hasn't gotten a rating and has not WikiProjects
 * It is a lot more in depth than what we have talked about in class

Don't forget to sign your talk/sandbox pages by signing using the 4 tildes in source editing mode. --Dr AB Swan (talk) 21:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Spatial Cognition Article Evaluation


 * Everything in the article is relevant but could use a lot of work
 * The article is written neutrally
 * Each claim has a citation and the citations are reliable

03:11, 19 February 2019 (UTC)JTR124 (talk)

 Bibliography Suggestions 

JTR124 (talk) 03:18, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Haun, Daniel B. M., et al. “Cognitive Cladistics and Cultural Override in Hominid Spatial Cognition.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 46, 2006, pp. 17568–17573. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/30052473.
 * Jacobs, Lucia F., et al. “Evolution of Spatial Cognition: Sex-Specific Patterns of Spatial Behavior Predict Hippocampal Size.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 16, 1990, pp. 6349–6352. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/2356205.
 * Jozet-Alves, Christelle, et al. “Sex Differences in Spatial Cognition in an Invertebrate: The Cuttlefish.” Proceedings: Biological Sciences, vol. 275, no. 1646, 2008, pp. 2049–2054. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/25249764.