User:JTRH/archive2

TPIR
Yeah, that might work as long as it's kept to "over 7000". *smashes his scouter* Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:39, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, and the infobox can say "over 7000". Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 17:15, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Ordinal Congress Templates
I've created templates for both the US Senate and US House for the changes in membership outline in the ordinal congresses. I noticed that there are a various iterations under different ordinals, this will make them all consistent when the template is applied. Then if anyone would like to make changes to the outline, all they would need to do is change the template, then all would be changed simultaneously and consistently for all congresses. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Congress/Ordinal congresses.......Pvmoutside (talk) 21:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested
Formal mediation of the dispute relating to Former On air Talent has been requested. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. For an explanation of what formal mediation is, see Mediation Committee/Policy. Please now review the request page and the guide to formal mediation, and then, in the "party agreement" section, indicate whether you agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page.

Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 23:45, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected
The request for mediation concerning WBBM-TV, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. An explanation of why it has not been possible for this dispute to proceed to formal mediation is provided at the mediation request page (which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time). Questions relating to the rejection of this dispute can be directed to the Committee chairperson or e-mailed to the mediation mailing list. For more information on other available steps in the dispute resolution process, see Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK  [&bull; ] 21:11, 15 May 2011 (UTC) (Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Your email
I don't find the diff you sent me to be sufficient for taking any action, but I will keep monitoring the situation. Best.·Maunus· ƛ · 00:02, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Wheel
I see nothing that says we can't use paywalled sources. I used a whole bunch of them on several good articles and nobody batted an eye. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 00:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Tell me how it's different from using a book as a source. Not everyone can verify the book because not everyone has it. WP:PAYWALL says, "The principle of verifiability implies nothing about ease of access to sources: some online sources may require payment, while some print sources may be available only in university libraries." So it's fine to use paywalled sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Wheel again
How did you not notice that the logo was tagged for speedy deletion? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 08:08, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * He's the one who tagged it. I sent that to you because usually you're so good at maintaining the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 13:27, 19 November 2011 (UTC)