User:JVu98/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Trichothecene

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The negative implications it has on human consumption were intriguing to me, yet the page feels either unfinished or not enough information on the topic.

Also, the talk section had a string regarding a possible plagiarism section from another website which gave me insight on user interaction on Wikipedia.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Overall impressions


 * Fairly good article explaining the group of trichothecenes as a whole
 * Surprised the regulatory aspect is a little underdeveloped even though the toxicity implications are high

Lead section


 * Odd section about Podostroma cornu-damae which I felt was trivial information that most readers wouldn't know by first glance, but could be a result of there not being a section available to put it in

Content


 * Relevant material


 * Doesn't address equity gaps or historically underrepresented populations

Images and Media


 * Mostly of chemical structure, but I can't really see any other images that can be used to describe the information any other way

Organization and writing quality


 * "A relatively few countries, primarily in the European Union, have recommended maximum limits for these mycotoxins in food and animal feed. However, trichothecenes are often tested for elsewhere, in order to prevent them from entering the food chain and to prevent losses in animal production."
 * Odd comma splice at "elsewhere, in order"