User:J dotter/Fixation (histology)/JdanR Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

J dotter


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:J%20dotter/Fixation_(histology)?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Fixation (histology)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

- No changes that I am seeing, and the current article lead looks good.

Content

- Content seems to update the current article well. Information appears up to date, some sources are on the older side (1997) but overall probably reflect the modern procedure. I am not necessarily seeing anything that is missing.

Tone and Balance

- Tone seems even throughout, not really trying to prove or disprove anything. Stays neutral and is laying out facts rather than trying to sway the reader towards any one idea. I would say that there is a primary focus given towards perfusion which makes an uneven distribution of information with heat fixation and immersion. Adding a sentence or two to those categories would balance the section out.

Sources and References

- Sources seem reputable, and seem to cover a wide array of the topic at hand and from the perspective of multiple journals and publishers. Sources are on the older side, but represent the field over time. Seem to cover primarily the how perfusion is done and a bit of the outcomes of perfusion.

Organization

- Added content is organized well and has decent flow. I am not seeing any grammatical errors at the moment, but I will say that there are probably a few wikipedia articles that could be linked inside the passage.

Images and Media

- Images will be hard for this one

Peer Review 2, December 9th, 2021

It all looks really good still. I would probably just once again say that if you have the information and the time, I think it would help the article addition feel more balanced if you add a bit to the topics of immersion and heat-fixation. They just seem to be in a grouping on the page, so it would probably flow better and look better on the page if they had equal amounts of information. Just something to think about, but once again it definitely is on the right track. An image idea that might work would be a sort of simplified graphic of the three different types, but other than that it is a hard topic for a picture.