User:Jack.Schriber77/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federico_Cesi

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This article is very bare, it doesn’t really describe what research he was done as a whole and it doesn’t describe what methods they used at all. It mainly described a lot of how he had to avoid the inquisition to get his work done but I really would like to see more of what his work was. They talked about about the creation of the academic group called the Accademia dei Lincei, but still only briefly described what they did

Evaluate the article
Everything in the article is the correct amount of content and it all related to the article. The notable gaps in this article is the science actually being conducted by this group. The talked briefly about how they were trying to unlock the secrets of science and how they were conducting experiments but those are never descried or elaborated on. The article if neutral, it is describing the life of Federico Cesi, so the tone is quite neutral no persuasion used at all. The sources are not the best, the first source used is of a short article from a website called the Galileo project, it is not a direct source at all and uses many sources itself. Only a total of 7 sources and one of the links did not work and most must use the internet way back machine to be functional. The talk page is quite bare, some of the discussion is just explain how one cannot use a source because they do not speak Italian. The other two items were first attempting to fix lost sources because the links no longer work and then how the article had to be changed because it conflicted with other wiki articles. Real discussion on this article has not happened for 15 years