User:Jack1231344/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
ChatGPT

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
i am a computer science student and i want to speialize in AI if possible.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Oerall i feel like this artical is well writen i only have a few points. i would say i feel like there are a few issues thos being the limitations, the language, and biases. limitation in my opinon they aren't very clear it basicly just gives the basic limitation that bing that it isn't humman. It doesn't give a lot of clear limitations for example. AI sorces tend to try and complete tasks in a quick manner, this tends to lead to errors. Weather it is a mathmatical error or a simply making up something. I would like to be clear they do bring up some errors like Algorithmic bias. This is not wrong but that is one of the only issues they say ChatGTP has which is false. Now for Language when reading this i am confused i seems like multiple people were involved in make this but it shows. the reason it shows is on one hand it seems a little biased to AI being really good then latter on it talks about how bad AI is bad for jobs and so on. so it is really inconsistent which is good but serten parts seem a little biased and not good. Not to mention some sections are just out of place like to summerize Medicine it bashis AI that it's knowladge is not as extensive as a trained doctor. AI is not the internet it doesn't have the same expearence a trained doctor would have so why complain tht it isn't able to do a toxicology or radiology as well as a human. it just seems unfair and not completly unbiased.