User:JackGradyP1/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Biomedicine

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose the article because it covers a wide range of subjects. I am also interested in Biomedicine and related fields. The article also describes related disciplines (molecular biology and biochemistry.)

Evaluate the article
The lead section provides a precise and well written definition. The overview gives an easy to understand but precise analysis, listing examples of subfields within biomedicine. The content is very much relevant and up-to-date. Most of the references are from publications and articles from recent years. The article is neutral. Only facts and scientific data are included, and it is free of any kind of bias or favoured viewpoints. The facts and sources are valid and backed up by the others. Any available literature on biomedicine is included. There are 23 references in total. The article is written and easy to follow. There are no spelling or grammar errors. There are no images included in the article. In the talk page, someone added a new definition and additional information. Two external links were modified. Those made changes described a way to assess the changes (parameter true/false, checking URL issues.) Overall, the article is well written, informative and easy to read. However, there is some information that could be irrelevant to some, the last two paragraphs of the overview. It could be improved by omitting those parts. But, it is complete and well developed.