User:JackJohnsonfan53/Cattleya violacea/Zrose26 Peer Review

General info
JackJohnsonFan53
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:JackJohnsonfan53/Cattleya violacea:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects:

Lead
The lead has not been updated to reflect the new content added. No lead present therefore the lead does not include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. The lead should but does not include a description of the article's major sections. Lead does not currently provide information that is not present in the article. Once lead is added it should be concise.

Content
Content added is relevant to the topic and up-to-date. Should include total geographical presence, what climates it grows in, morphological description, taxonomy, cultural relevance if applicable.

Tone and Balance
Content added is neutral and factual.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:

Content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information. Content accurately reflects what the cited sources say. Sources are peer reviewed and reputable. Sources are thorough and current written by experts in the field of botany. Links are active and working.

Organization
Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written with no grammatical or spelling errors. Content is well organized.

Images and Media
Images and media not added.

Overall impressions
Content added is mostly Seed Characteristics and Growth Conditions. Other topics can be expanded on- total geographical presence, what climates it grows in, morphological description, taxonomy, cultural relevance if applicable.

The article is more complete and strengths are the Seed Characteristics and Growth Conditions section.

Examples of good feedback
A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.


 * Peer review of "Homemaking"
 * Peer review of this article about a famous painting