User:Jack Merridew/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jack Merridew

Report date January 24 2010, 09:30 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

How is this user being allowed to edit pages on Wikipedia if he is a sockpuppet? '' ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ ―Œ  ♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣  09:30, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by '' ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ ―Œ  ♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣
 * Oh, my apologies. His user page misled me as it said contrary statements. On top it was written that this user has been blocked indefinitely. And then was written that this user has to be commended for trying to make a clean start again, or whatever... Anyway, I assume I reported the user here by mistake. Thanks '' ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ ―Œ  ♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣  09:34, 24 January 2010 (UTC)


 * It's ok ;) my userpage says *unblocked*, not blocked. Jack Merridew 09:38, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Apologies again. Not a good day to start editing I guess (for me). Sorry for the inconvenience. I have withdrawn the report. '' ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ ―Œ  ♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣  09:44, 24 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Yah, I am a sockpuppet. See my userpage. Cheers, Jack Merridew 09:33, 24 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

SPIclose
 * Conclusions

Yes, it's widely known that Jack is a street-legal sockpuppet first class. No action needed here. See his user page for explanation of his status. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:44, 24 January 2010 (UTC)