User:Jackdawgirl/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Conformity

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I am interested in this topic and done some relevant research on it. I would like to add something to it so that people can gain a more thorough understanding of it. Also, it is a C-class article with high-importance.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Clearly defined the topic, but the leading section fails to provide an overview of each main section. Overall, it’s a neutral article and informative article. More reliable sources are needed, and it should be more organized.

Maybe use “types of conformity” instead of “varieties”. Can add new sections about real-world effects and consequences.

Also, it doesn’t flow very well. The “Peer” and “Social responses” seem to be background information. Maybe start with defining the topic and background information, then presenting “varieties”, main experiments, specific predictors, then the real-world effects.