User:Jackie1236/Overchoice/Eestrad1019 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

jackie1236


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jackie1236/Overchoice?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Overchoice

Evaluate the drafted change
Lead: Overall, I thought the lead was strong, however my one recommendation would maybe include a blip about how social media has impacted choice pools since you talk about dating apps so much - briefly introduce the idea.

Content: Overall, the content all seems relevant to the subject and adds a new dimension to the article, also making it more modern by talking about the impact of online dating.

Tone and Balance: The drafted change does take a neutral tone - I would be careful with using extreme terms such as "incredibly" or "worse", slightly negative undertones but that could be based on the findings of the research or my own bias, overall does discuss multiple viewpoints, no effort to sway the reader to one position

Sources and References: All sources seem up to date and valid, good balance of primary and secondary sources

Organization: The drafted change is concise and easy to read and organized in a way that makes sense, no grammatical or spelling errors that I picked up on.

No images were added - maybe add an image?

Overall impressions: I feel that the content added is valuable, especially because it is relevant in this day and age with the rise of online dating and the pool of potential romantic partners becomes so much larger. For swiping behaviors section maybe tie is back a little more to the idea of choice overload but other than that great job!