User:Jackson Peebles/Adoption/Generic Exam 2

1.) Q- In your own words, explain what it means to assume good faith.
 * A-
 * /5 Instructor Comments:

2.) Q- Explain how you would deal with this scenario using specifics: You are working in New Page Patrol and come across a new page that, though it's content is fine, has a few minor formatting issues. The page is three minutes old. You fix the format issues on the page. A few minutes later, you get a nasty note on your talk page which states that you caused the new editor, who created the page, an edit conflict by performing your few minor corrections. He was unaware of how to correct an edit conflict, and therefore lost everything he was trying to do. He even goes so far as to start an AN/I discussion about how you're incompetent and should butt out of his editing. What specific steps would you take? Disclaimer: This is based on a true story. Note: A similar question will be asked once we get to the dispute resolution question, but simply based on assuming good faith, I want to here how you'd approach this scenario.
 * A-
 * /5 Instructor Comments:

3.) Have a look at the conversation below: Well, the Passat lover clearly loves his Passat, but who is he replying to? In

3a.) Position A?
 * A-
 * /5 Instructor Comments:

3b.) Position B?
 * A-
 * /5 Instructor Comments:

3c.) An editor who has a low edit count seems awfully competent with templates. Should he be reported as a possible WP:SOCK?
 * A-
 * /5 Instructor Comments:
 * /25 Instructor Comments:

Once you have finished, please notify me on my talk page using the above button, then proceed to Lesson 3: Vandalism.