User:Jaclure/Treatment of cancer/Liviaamurphy444 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jaclure


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Treatment of cancer
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * - Yes, and the article is very cleanly organized as well. Each therapy is easy to find and learn more about.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * - Seems neutral consistantly throughout article.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * - Yes, the article focuses almost entirely on Western methods of treating cancer and rarely acknowledges other recent countries' methods.
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * - Following doesn't include full citation
 * "How Does Radiation Therapy Work?" American Cancer Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Mar. 2017.
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * - Article relies too heavily of primary sources and needs more medical references to meet necessary level of verification.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * - Following doesn't include full citation
 * "How Does Radiation Therapy Work?" American Cancer Society. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Mar. 2017.
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * - Article relies too heavily of primary sources and needs more medical references to meet necessary level of verification.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * - Article relies too heavily of primary sources and needs more medical references to meet necessary level of verification.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?

- Missing citations for radiation therapy to back points.