User:JacobWhite28/Salmonella enterica/Maxwellmcgowan Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead contains all of the sections required and also references the article which is very good. It provides a very good introduction to the changes in the article and uses language that is easy to understand on its own.

Content

The content is mostly up to date, it also brings in content that is on topic. It may be helpful to add more detail to the existing sections.

Tone & Balance

The tone is neutral and stays entirely within facts. This is very good and doesn't try to persuade the viewer.

Sources & Reference

Some of the sources are older (2012 & 2006) but all are from post 2000. All are from government sources giving validity to the sources and the reference section in general.

Organization

Zero grammar and spelling issues.

Images & Media

N/A