User:Jacob Khorsandi/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
1977 National Women's Conference

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article to evaluate, because I was intrigued to learn more about this significant event in the historical movement for women's rights. Upon reading the title of the article, I was initially familiar with the event, yet I was curious to expand my understanding of abortion rights and injustices related to sexual orientation.

Evaluate the article
Lead section: The introductory sentence concisely describes the main components of the event, including the time period, duration, and the leading actors/organizations. The lead section does not appear to effectively describe the article's primary sections or topics. The lead information does not include irrelevant information with regards to the article's topic.

Content: The article's content is strongly relevant to the topic, as it highlights various important issues that the conference discussed, including abortion rights, discrimination against sexual orientation, etc. The content appears to be up-to-date, and it employs a plethora of evidence, including textual and photographic information. The article addresses topics related to historically underrepresented populations, as it elucidates the inequities involving women with disabilities in addition to women of color.

Tone and Balance: The article appears to be neutral, given that the format of sections is similar to a declaration. To illustrate, the article begins by providing introductory context to the conference, and it proceeds to clearly explain each distinct subtopic that was addressed at the conference. These sections neutrally present issues and concerns that were voiced at the event. Moreover, this article fairly voices the perspectives of minority women, including African-American and Mexican American women, in addition to representing the outlooks from White American women. The article does not attempt to persuade its audience to believe a particular ideology, because it neutrally and factually presents the concerns, perspectives, and context regarding the women's rights conference.

Sources and References: This article fairly utilizes academic and peer-reviewed publications as evidence. Moreover, the sources are primarily from the latter half of the twentieth century, and a smaller portion of sources are from the early twenty-first century. The article employs sources that reflect a diverse pool of authors, including White American women, Mexican American women, and African American women. Also, upon clicking the links from the sources, they fortunately work and correctly bring me to the source's original domain.

Organization and Writing Quality: The article is evidently well-written, given that the textual content is clear and the sections are neatly organized. To illustrate, the article transitions from introductory context to a format that resembles the American Declaration of Independence (1776). These sections each encapsulate a societal issue or topic that was discussed, ranging from reproductive rights to injustices related to rape.

Images and Media: The article effectively uses a handful of photographic images that enhance the audience's understanding of the conference. These images, many of which were taken during the conference, demonstrate the significant size of the audience and the event. More importantly, the images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations, and every image has a concise caption illustrating the specific people in the photos.

Talk Page Discussion: The talk page discussion describes a few issues with the narrative (approximately five issues were commented). A notable issue or concern relates to the content creator digressing from certain actors of the women's conference and excessively elucidating First Ladies in American politics. Moreover, the article is indeed part of various WikiProjects involving "Feminism," "United States," and "Women's History."

Overall Impressions: Ultimately, the article is well-developed, as it explains accurate information pertaining to the women's conference itself and who specifically was in attendance. Furthermore, the article voices the perspectives and outlooks of a diverse spectrum of female leaders, including White American women, African American women, and Mexican American women. However, the article's content can be enhanced by adding more clarifying information regarding the controversies of welfare and rural women. While other sections of the conference are effectively illustrated, the topics of child care funding and equal rights between rural men and women can be further elucidated.