User:Jacobkee/Partulina mighelsiana/Elewis3 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?  My own because no one reviewed mine
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:Jacobkee/Partulina mighelsiana
 * Link to the current version of the article:
 * Partulina mighelsiana

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Has a source for each piece of information.
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family) It also talks about what threatens the species.
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? Yes.
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved? Yes.
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) Yes.
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? Yes.
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? Yes.
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? Yes.
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources? The quality of the sources are good because they have reliable information and pictures.
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article? Add more information and more headers and maybe some pictures.
 * 15) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? Not yet I need more information and some pictures.
 * 16) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Add more information, and maybe add more references since I only have 4.
 * 17) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?