User:Jacqueline Kruis/Books/United States interventions and non-interventions could have been better with higher values

Questioning United States actions

 * The definition of intervention and interventionism
 * Should the United States intervene in the international disputes the don't affect national security?
 * Should the United States play a role in promoting and ensuring democracy across the world?
 * As a world superpower is the United States obligated to use its influence to police international injustice?
 * How has the Bush Doctrine changed the way that the United States approaches foreign policy?
 * What have been the implications of the Bush Doctrine?
 * Should the United States put the interests of other nations and people on the same level as the interests of their own population?
 * Should the military action be used to protect national economic or political interests when national security is the being directly threatened?
 * Is preventative war as prescribed within the scope of the Bush Doctrine a justified way to approach foreign policy?
 * Should the United States play a role in arming or assisting a non allied nation or organization involved in a civil war for political power?
 * Is it the United States' responsibility to act unilaterally to stop or prevent genocide in foreign nations?
 * United States non-interventionism
 * Intervention (law)
 * Interventionism
 * United States
 * Non-interventionism
 * International relations
 * U.S. state


 * About the Author