User:JadaClark2002/2000s/Asrogers23 Peer Review

General info
User:JadaClark2002
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:JadaClark2002/2000s
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 2000s
 * 2000s

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

n/a - Lead/Intro section has not been edited yet

Content

These edits have so far focused on including relevant cultural-touchstone topics to the 2000s article. The included information has been notable and accurate. Excellent citation attributing credit to the inventor of the modern vape/e-cigarette. I do think that the addition about low-rise pants could benefit from the inclusion of a source, like an example of an event when the style was brought into focus by a particular designer/model/celebrity. No irrelevant information has been added.

Tone and Balance

No tone/balance issues stood out to me among these edits - they have primarily served to provide additional information about notably relevant bits of popular culture during the decade. I would not say that the edits have over/under-represented any viewpoint or argued for a specific point of view (other than that "[TV Show]" and "[Video Game]" that came out in the 2000s are relevant and notable pieces of the 2000s).

Sources and References

Good citation for the inventor of the vape, could maybe find something to reference regarding low-rise pants. Most other additions link to elsewhere on Wikipedia, and don't seem to result in any cyclical references, so don't necessarily need an external citation.

Organization

I noticed that there was an edit to the article's section(s) that was later reverted by another user - but I don't fully understand the reasoning.

There was a small typo ("game" was written "dame") which I corrected.