User:Jadeevelynn/Transfeminism/Runmiaogwu Peer Review

General info
I'm reviewing the work of User: Jadeevelynn, Oliviapants, Troyandabedinthemorn
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jadeevelynn/Transfeminism
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Transfeminism

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

Their introduction is very clear and has a good description. Contains what they want to introduce but maybe it's because the article isn't finished with the back part so I don't know what's going to be written after it so it's a little unclear. But what is there is clear and well linked.

Content:

I found the history section to be clearly written and I quickly learned what the history was like. The ending of the current issue part, the place where a boy becomes a transgender woman or a woman becomes a man needed to be a little more clear and left me a little confused, but otherwise it was written in a very specific way.

Tone and Balance:

The writing is mostly neutral and for the most part doesn't indicate too strong of a biased viewpoint. In the one section on trans men rejecting the lived experience of being a woman, I think there was some confusion even though I seemed neutral.

Sources, References and Medias:

Each paragraph is followed by an indication of the corresponding citation, which is very clear. There are no images added at the moment, hopefully some will be added later on

Organization：

Right now I can only see two complete structures, some of the later ones haven't been added yet. The first two structures have a good connection to lead.

Overall impressions:

The articles available so far are very clear on the subject and explain what the conflict is. Although the previous article has been relatively more complete with a lot of content but still a lot of good points written.