User:Jadeperry99/Elton Fax/Chengbatian Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Elton Fax's page witch is editing by Jade Parry.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jadeperry99/Elton Fax
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Elton Fax

Evaluate the drafted changes
The content added is relevant to the topic. It is added about career. It’s followed by Wikipedia's guidelines. It does not address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics. The content added is neutral. There are not any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. It does not have viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented. It does not add an attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another. All new content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information. The content accurately reflects what the cited sources say. Compared to the current draft, sources are current. Sources were written by a diverse spectrum of authors. It is hard for me to tell if there are better sources available, but I think the sources that have been picked are good sources. Some sources are books, some of them are websites. I worked. The content added is well-written it is easy to read. I don’t see any writing problems. The content added is well-organized. The content has more details that have been added, I think it will be better to have some pictures of his books and works he has been done on the page.