User:Jaeden Akins/Spokane Valley–Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer/Corgiflash4! Peer Review

General info
Jaeden Akins, Addylynr, CoffeeAddictedBrokeandAnxious
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Jaeden Akins/Spokane Valley–Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer:Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Spokane Valley–Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer

Lead
The lead was included and clearly describes the article's topic. I think it also does a great job of linking in your topics you wrote about and concise with the lead.

Content
I thought the content you had listed and explained covers a lot of information for each paragraph. I thought the content was up to date and the content was put into each paragraph nicely. Explanation and quality was done well.

Tone and Balance
The tone of the additional information added was very well balanced and carried a neutral tone throughout the article. I thought the information written wasn't biased or led towards one end of the conversation.

Source and References
The sources were well up to date and were reliable. When clicking on the links, they led me to the sources and the information given. On the other hand, I thought the references could provide links to the articles that way the sources and references line up. The reference layout was very well written.

Organization
Overall organization well written, celar, and easy to read. Grammar was well used and I saw really no spelling errors. The sections really reflected the overall topic very well through each paragraph.

Images and Media
There were no images provided.

Overall Impressions
Overall, I thought the additions to the article was very informative and well organized. All three paragraphs were overall great in quality and quantity. I think the thing that could be worked on is the reference links.