User:Jaeden D/Cerithium zebrum/AMLeeward Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jaeden D.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing.
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jaeden%20D/Cerithium_zebrum?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article.
 * Cerithium zebrum
 * Cerithium zebrum

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you? | I thought that there were people who would succeed quickly, but we are all learning at the same pace. That is true everyone is learning at their own pace but I sure do believe that all of us will succeed if we put in the effort.
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family) | The article only discusses the species. It's what I aimed to do since in our professor's instructions our main focus is on our species, not the family.
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? | The subtitles are appropriate. I did my best to make sure each section was appropriate for the information I was putting under it.
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved? | All information is appropriate. An organized article just makes things a lot easier for people to read and find what it's about.
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) | Information is easy to understand. I like to word my details a lot so feedback from the professor to better improve on it helped me make the language of my article easier to read but at the same time still give the information it's supposed to.
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? | Not all information is cited with a link. I do need to change that because linking after each of my sentences proves where I got this information.
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? | Yes. Just making sure to follow the template on how all Wikipedia articles are written where the references are at the bottom.
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? | No. It's another thing I have to fix because some have numbers next to them but others don't.
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources? | The quality is good for creating an article about the species. Thank you for those words because it took a lot to find sources that focused on my species and use good quality articles.
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article? | I would improve the article by adding more information and citations. That is something I will do adding more information and at the same time adding my citations at the end of them.
 * 15) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? | No, I believe adding more information, and sticking to the requirements of the project would allow this article to see the world. I do believe so as well that my article isn't ready at the moment but in time it will be for the world to see with editing it will be.
 * 16) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? | Receiving second opinions and reviews is the most important thing. I sure do think seeing other people's opinions on my article does help a lot because it allows me to see details about my article I don't see and the negatives other people see.
 * 17) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? | I would add more citations to my article. I hope you are able to take in what you read from my article and apply it to yours and when you're finished I believe your article will be ready for prime time for the world to see.