User:Jaelienrivera/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Gender archaeology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because I was interested in reading more about the role that gender played in archaeology and the history behind it as well. As with many thing of our past, there has always been dominant male-representation in different fields, so it was important to me to read more about the background and how more and more women started playing bigger roles in these fields, specifically archaeology.

This article matters because it gives insight on how gender can provide information circling around culture and biology. But it also goes into detail about Feminist theories and builds off of that to discuss further about Feminism and Black Feminism in archaeology.

At first, I thought that this article would just cover the role that gender played in archaeology and the type of information that it could reveal. I wasn't expecting it to go over Feminism and women working in the field of Archaeology.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

I found this article to be well-written and well-developed. I think that some more information regarding the role that gender played in the discoveries could be added. I'm not quite sure what the first image is for, so it would be nice to have some background on that and how it relates to the article. The article seems very neutral, not siding more on male or female archaeologists more, but making it so they are viewed as equal. The facts provided are referenced from reliable sources, coming from many different sources. There is not much on the talk page, but it is also part of a WikiProject.