User:Jaf020/Lumber River/MamaUniversee Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Jaf020
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Jaf020/Lumber River

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No all the content added belongs.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? The content that was added is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Over represented.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No the new information does not seem to contain new sources.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? The sources added are links to other wiki pages that are mentioned throughout the original page.
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? The sources are from other wiki pages. Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes the information added is clear and concise
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes the information added was added to established sections.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The sections are a little more full which is an overall positive.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Provided detail to the sections edited.
 * How can the content added be improved? Don't forget to remove the edit part from the section headings.