User:Jahernandez9165/Evaluate an Article

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochefoucauld_Grail

I felt like this article would be interesting because it had the word grail in the title.

Yes I believe it has a good introduction of the article

No it does not go over the article sections

The lead has information that is present throughout the article

The lead is concise but could use more over explaining

Yes it’s relevant

Yes it is up to date

Yes content missing about proof of ownership

The article is neutral

There are no claims

More viewpoints would help

No it’s not persuasive at all

Yes I checked the links

Yes the sources or thorough and present more information then the article

Yes the sources are current

The links do work yes

yes it is clear and well written

No grammar errors that caught my eye looks good

The sections could be clearer maybe more sections will help organize it

images/

The article did have images to help could have used more images to help out even more. The images are well captioned and follow Wikipedia’s guidelines

Checking the talk page:

There is no conversations about this topic on its talk page

I believe it is ungraded and I’m not sure if it’s part of any wiki projects I assume it is

I don’t believe we have discussed this topic in class yet

Overall impressions: This article had great facts about the manuscript of Rochefoucauld Grail it was well developed. The statement about previous ownership of the manuscript was a bit confusing it said it belonged to a certain family but in that same sentence it said that there was no proof of that ownership. I would like to know more about why there is no proof of that statement. At the end of the article it felt like a random quote about the manuscript I would’ve like to hear more from the Wikipedia author instead.