User:Jahernandez9165/Rochefoucauld Grail

The article had great facts about the manuscript of Rochefoucauld Grail. The statement about previous ownership of the manuscript was a bit confusing it said that it belonged to a certain family but in that same sentence it said that there was no proof of that ownership. I would like to know more about why there is no proof for that statement. At the end I believe there was a quote that felt random about the manuscript. I would’ve like to hear more about that statement in the Wikipedia author’s words.