User:Jailene Badillo/sandbox

Article Evaluation:

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

- Everything in the article seems to be relevant to the topic. I did not find anything distracting about the article itself. I do wish it had more pictures, it feels some what bland.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

- All of the information seems to be up to date. The article, even has information on the two upcoming Fast and the Furious.

What else could be improved?

- I feel as though the timeline is a little confusing. Under the timeline order there are 2 movies that have lines through them rather than a number. Almost as if these 2 movies were not important.

Is the article neutral? Are there an claims that apear heavily biased toward a particular position?

- For the most part the article seems neutral. It states strictly facts about each one of the Fast and the Furious movies that have so far come out. Nothing leads me to believe that the author of this article added any of his/her own bias when writing the article.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

- I do feel more can be said about the two short films listed in the article. It seemed as though the movies were more of importance when writing this article over the two short films.

Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

- All of the links do work. The sources seem to support the claims stated in the article.