User:JaimeWalton/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: William's Doll
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate: William's Doll shows the problem with socially/culturally established gender norms and the social stigma of boys wanting to engage in feminine activities and girls wanting to engage in masculine activities.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? No.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Overly detailed.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes.
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Yes.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Yes.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? No.
 * Are the sources current? No.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? No.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? No.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No.
 * Are images well-captioned? No.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? There is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in the Wikipedia article constitutes fair use.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Since the book is centered around breaking gender norms, there are still many conversations about what is socially acceptable and appropriate for boys' and girls' clothing, toys, and expression.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Stub and Start-Class, it is within the scope of WikiProject children's literature.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? There is no conversation about the topic on the talk page.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Unorganized, lacking structure, lacking detailed information.
 * What are the article's strengths? Summarizing the entire book in about four to five sentences.
 * How can the article be improved? The addition of major sections, structure, and updated sources/content on the book.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Underdeveloped.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: