User:Jaime Wegener/Mental health in education/Dowhannah Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jaime Wegener


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Mental health in education (still working on it)


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Mental health in education

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?
 * The impressive part about this article is how much content it provides. There are multiple sections which breaks up the information into smaller bits, and that is helpful for understanding the topic and its context in the world.


 * What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?
 * I think there should be more citations in the article. There seems to be quite a few bits of information that are missing references. This change would be an improvement because it would add validity to the content of the article, and this is necessary since there is so much content in the article.


 * What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * I think my previous suggestions are the most important thing the author could do to improve the article. Wikipedia places a lot of emphasis on the importance of citing our sources, so it is clear that this easy change would bear a large significance.


 * Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!
 * I, too, need to add more references in my article. I will work on including more citations as I work on my draft as well.