User:Jaimee.Pal/Cooper's Artificial Reef/ESenvironment Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jaimee.Pal


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jaimee.Pal/Cooper Reef


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

[x] introductory sentence that clearly describes the article's topic

[x] brief outline of the article's main sections is in Lead

[x] Lead is concise

[] red link "recfishwest" does not have wiki page

Content:

[x] Content is relevant

[x] Content is up-to-date

[x] Topic is new and interesting; has not yet been covered in an article

[] some content is missing in some sections because the article is still being worked on

Tone and Balance[x] article uses neutral tone

[x] does not appear bias

Sources and references

[x] some sources for important information are current

[] some sentences are missing sources/citations; article is still being worked on

[x] Content reflects the cited sources

[x] Links work

Organization

[x]content is easy to read

[x] good table of contents; very well organized

[x] no spelling errors

Notes: Topic is super interesting! I really like the sections you provided for the topic. I understand article is not complete. History section could have more background information, maybe funding could be put in the construction section(?). You have a good set of sources.

~ESenvironment