User:Jaimekatz926/READ 180/Lovelyr79 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jaimekatz926


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jaimekatz926/READ_180?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

There is a strong and clear lead. Very thorough explanation of the READ 180 program. Perhaps you can add something to explain that Read 180 is computer based. You allude to it later, but it might be helpful upfront too. The third paragraph doesn't include citations, though not sure if they are necessary.

In effectiveness sentence- there is a typo- eighth graders should be eighth grade. Is it necessary to mention who conducted the study for the first two and last mentioned? "While the study" sentence can be broken up (I feel like I'm being nit-picky...).

The article paints a clear picture of what Read 180 is, and also shows research-based evidence of its effectiveness. The part about it being more effective for middle and high school is intriguing. Can you mention that earlier in your draft? Maybe mention this study first? Is your entire piece meant to be for middle and high school?

Your list of sources is comprehensive. The tone is neutral and there are many facts provided. I feel like, were I to purchase and use READ 180, that I would be an informed consumer.