User:JakeTayon/Adventurous motility/BFonzy56 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Brysonbaggs, Hunterbranch, JakeTayon, JonnyBoy6989, LexiKoplin, TriniGonzales


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:JakeTayon/Adventurous motility


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * There is a lot of good information in this article. The biggest thing that I would do first is to update the lead to reflect the rest of the article and give a little more background information about the following sections.
 * The tone and balance were good. The cilia and flagella that seem to be in the beginning stages and there is lots of opportunity to expand on those.
 * The organization could be tightened up a bit. I like how the history is right at the beginning, for me that always is a place I go to first. I'm not sure why there is a section titled "adventurous motility". It seems like it is more about the two major hypotheses explaining adventurous motility.