User:JakeTayon/Adventurous motility/QueenStarrUniverse Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Plenty of various, credible resources that are clearly linked and cited. There are a few instances where information was given without specifying a source, but that could be because the next listed source includes all the information that preceded it. The article is full of great information, but the organization is a little choppy. It's a little hard to read, especially if the reader wasn't a scientist. I would recommend writing out the stuff you have, including more explanations to the information. For instance, "This exploring movement is possible through a mix of slime secretion, motor proteins, and focal adhesion complexes." found under the History heading. This assumes the reader already knows what slime secretion, etc. are. However, I would suggest writing out what each of these are and how they contribute to adventurous motility.

This is merely a suggestion, the article is still great! All the information is insightful, I love the picture, and all in all you seem to be headed in a great direction.