User:Jake Bricknell/Professional sports in Canada/Isaiahskeete Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.. General info


 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Jake Bricknell
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jake%20Bricknell/Professional_sports_in_Canada/Isaiahskeete_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review

Lead
Guiding questions:

Lead evaluation
- With in this article it is clear and concise it has been updated to reflect the new content that is shared. It gives a strong lead first describing the Professional sports in Canada. The introductory sentence clearly describes the articles focus in a sum

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
There is much more information given to a particular sport for example hockey has a lot more detail information whereas lacrosse or the less popular sports lack in information to support each claim.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
- This article is easy to read making it very clear for its reader its point he is trying to give off. He has made it clear to read each sport breaking it up into a total of 10 sports all outlined clear.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
- All the images used capture the readers attention supporting each sport with relevant images. All the images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations enhancing the understanding of the topic.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

New Article Evaluation
- This article links other articles to show that there are many different articles supporting his ideas. It gives strong features to make it easy to read for example its headings and info-boxes. This article is supported by 2 reliable secondary sources that accurately represent all available literature on the subject.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
- The content added enhance the article to create a stronger point that improves the overall quality of the article. The content added can be improved by drawing and relation back to the unpopulor sport showing its significance to the overall focus of profess nail sports in Canada.