User:Jakeparvin/Edaphology/CeceliaOberts Peer Review

General info
Jakeparvin
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jakeparvin/Edaphology?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Edaphology

Evaluate the drafted changes
The additions made to the Wiki page are a great start! I like that you are adding in more history on the study and how the name came about. This is definitely relevant information for your topic and I feel that it helps to introduce what you will be discussing in the page as a whole. I also appreciate how you were able to introduce the two conflicting names for the study in a way that did not favor one over the other. It worked to keep your additions nonbiased and purely about stating the fact. This also made your writing sound very credible. As far as organization, I think that you can actually move you additions before the original two paragraphs instead of after. I feel that your additions will introduce the concept of edaphology and the origins of the name which would lead nicely into the other two paragraphs that discuss famous endaphologists and experiments. Other than that, I think that you have a really good start for your additions!